Here’s today’s Final Jeopardy (in the category Contemporary Art) for Thursday, January 17, 2019 (Season 35, Episode 94):
After it was auctioned in 2018, a work by this artist was renamed “Love Is In The Bin”
(correct response beneath the contestants)
Today’s contestants:
Caroline Cawley, a research associate from San Mateo, California![]() |
Frank Orlando, a professor from Wesley Chapel, Florida![]() |
John Presloid, a microbiologist from Perrysburg, Ohio (1-day total: $12,000)![]() |
The Jeopardy! Book of Answers is out now! Here’s my review.
Are you going on the show and looking for information about how to bet in Final Jeopardy? Check out my new Betting Strategy 101 page!
(Content continues below)
Correct response: Who is Banksy?
More information about Final Jeopardy:
Originally titled “Girl with Balloon” as a 2006 adaptation of his 2002 mural series, it was created with a self-destruct mechanism in case the work was ever put up for auction (namely, a shredder). It sold at Sotheby’s for £1,042,000, a record for a Banksy work, on October 5, 2018 (about seven and a half weeks before this episode taped.)
The buyer, as it turned into a piece of art history, elected to keep the piece. (Banksy, in turn, re-authenticated it with the new title, “Love Is in the Bin”.)
Here’s a video with Sotheby’s talking about the significance of what Banksy did, along with footage of the actual shredding as it happened (the shredding begins at 0:46):
There’s always something new coming into The Jeopardy! Fan Online Store, including something perfect for Boston baseball fans! Here are our top-selling items!
Looking to find out who won Jeopardy! today? Tonight’s results are below!
Scores going into Final:
John $25,200
Frank $11,800
Caroline $7,400
Tonight’s results:
Caroline $7,400 + $4,401 = $11,801 (Who is Banksy? 🙂 )
Frank $11,800 – $3,001 = $8,799 (Who is Pollock?)
John $25,200 + $0 = $25,200 (2-day total: $37,200)
Scores after the Jeopardy! Round:
John $11,600
Frank $4,200
Caroline $3,400
Opening break taken after: 15 clues
Daily Double locations:
1) FER SURE, IT WAS THE ’80s $800 (20th pick)
John 4000 +4000 (Caroline 3200 Frank 2600)
2) CHEMISTRY $1600 (5th pick)
John 16000 +6000 (Frank 4200 Caroline 3400)
3) BEARD MAN $2000 (22nd pick)
Frank 6200 +4000 (John 24000 Caroline 4200)
Overall Daily Double Efficiency for this game: 202
Unplayed clues:
J! round: None!
DJ! Round: None!
Total $ Left On Board: $0
Game Stats:
John $17,600 Coryat, 24 correct, 1 incorrect, 38.60% in first on buzzer, 1/1 on rebound attempts
Caroline $7,400 Coryat, 13 correct, 3 incorrect, 28.07% in first on buzzer
Frank $9,800 Coryat, 16 correct, 1 incorrect, 26.32% in first on buzzer, 1/1 on rebound attempts
Combined Coryat Score: $34,800
Lach Trash: $10,600 (on 7 Triple Stumpers)
Coryat lost to incorrect responses (less double-correct responses): $8,600
John Presloid, stats to date:
41 correct, 2 incorrect
3/4 on rebound attempts
30.97% in first on buzzer (35/113)
2/2 on Daily Doubles (Net Earned: $10,000)
2/2 in Final Jeopardy
Average Coryat: $12,500
John Presloid, to win:
3 games: 53.90%
4: 29.05%
5: 15.66%
6: 8.44%
7: 4.55%
Avg. streak: 3.169 games.
Tournament of Champions projections:
With a projected 146 regular-play games to go prior to the Tournament of Champions cutoff, after 500,000 simulations, our model shows:
An average of 4.1369 5+-time champions (standard deviation 1.7051).
An average of 7.5093 4+-time champions (standard deviation 2.1101).
An early cutoff took place 20.725% of the time (or a 5-game winner will be left out).
John Presloid qualified 16.225% of the time.
Anneke Garcia qualified 55.588% of the time.
Dave Leffler qualified 30.521% of the time.
Jonathan Dinerstein qualified 10.276% of the time.
Alex Schmidt qualified 2.604% of the time.
Jackie Fuchs qualified 0.298% of the time.
Andy’s Thoughts:
- Well, that was a much better game out of John!
- Although this was rendered moot by Final Jeopardy, Frank’s bet of $4,000 on the final Daily Double was not enough. Of course, he ended up $800 short of half of John’s total.
- After Caroline gave no answer to CHEMISTRY $2000, I thought there would be a rebound. Of course, as I’m sure Kevin Shrum will comment on at some point, sometimes a player forgets that rebounds are on the table!
- For what it’s worth, Fritz Haber is near-Pavlovian for ammonia. Except for the time he apparently tried to finance Germany’s World War I reparations by trying to extract gold from seawater, which somehow made it into a 1997 clue.
- Frank had a better time in his Sports Jeopardy! appearance on the buzzer than he did in this game!
- Considering Marianopolis College in Montréal was tweeting about Caroline being an alumna, I’m not surprised that Caroline picked up the $600 and $1000 clues in STATES & PROVINCES, the Stanley Cup clue in A TROPHY CATEGORY, and mildly amused that Frank beat Caroline in on the buzzer on the clue about Quebec!
Contestant photo credit: jeopardy.com
When commenting, please note that all comments on The Jeopardy! Fan must be in compliance with the Site Comment Policy.
If you are going to quote any statistics from this page or this website, attribution is required.
I have a comment about tonight’s show – John, Frank and Caroline 1-17-19 please contact me I will not post it here and can’t find an email address to send it to
Jeopardy’s general contact page is at https://www.jeopardy.com/contact
Glad the Perrysburg, Ohio boy got the Toledo question right! 🙂
I don’t normally second-guess contestants, but I would expect a microbiologist to know ammonia. For what it’s worth.
Well, that’s why I went with “sometimes players forget they can rebound in the heat of the moment.”
One of these days I will learn how to read.
You can see it on my face, I wanted to buzz in so bad but was too scared to for some reason. Even as a returning champ, the jeopardy fear is REAL.
Missed the shoutout until now, but I can confirm Andy’s comment about standing patiently wondering why the next clue hasn’t yet been called instead of picking up a rebound
Good thing we know Andy is a terrifically nice person. Someone who doesn’t know that might suspect he was still rubbing it in … after two years. 🙂
What are “rebounds” and, under stats, “rebound attempts?”
A “rebound” happens when one player responds incorrectly and another responds to the same clue correctly (the correct player gets credit for a rebound)
A “rebound attempt” happens when another player signals after a player responds incorrectly, whether the player is correct or incorrect.
Thanks, Andy…