Here’s today’s Final Jeopardy (in the category Words of the 2000s) for Friday, May 3, 2019 (Season 35, Episode 170):
In 2008, TIME Magazine described this new practice as “one part social networking and one part capital accumulation”
(correct response beneath the contestants)
Today’s contestants:
Carol Hansen, a retired database administrator from San Francisco, California |
Pete Vanderhyden, an airline pilot from Murrieta, California |
James Holzhauer, a professional sports gambler from Las Vegas, Nevada (21-day total: $1,608,627) |
Whoever wins this game won’t return until May 20; the show’s annual Teachers Tournament is taking place from May 6-17.
If you’re curious to see how James’ stats so far shape up to those of Ken Jennings, you can find them at A James Holzhauer vs. Ken Jennings Statistical Comparison.
James has reached 700 correct responses on the show and has moved to #2 all-time on that list! See who else has at least 300 on our 300 Club page!
Did you write any of the online tests last month? You can find last week’s questions and answers here!
The Jeopardy! Book of Answers is out now! Here’s my review.
Are you going on the show and looking for information about how to bet in Final Jeopardy? Check out my new Betting Strategy 101 page!
(Content continues below)
Correct response: What is crowdfunding?
Did you know that you can now find game-by-game stats of everyone, including James, who has won 10 or more games on Jeopardy!, here on the site?
More information about Final Jeopardy:
According to the same September 4, 2008 article (full article behind a paywall), crowdfunding website “seek to harness the enthusiasm–and pocket money–of virtual strangers, promising them a cut of the returns”. Famous crowdfunding websites include Kickstarter, Indiegogo, and even Patreon!
Since Alex Trebek’s diagnosis of stage 4 pancreatic cancer, many community members have been raising money. The Jeopardy! Fan Online Store is as well! All proceeds from any “Keep The Faith And We’ll Win” shirt sold will be donated to the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network. To date, over $300 has been raised.)
Looking to find out who won Jeopardy! today? Tonight’s results are below!
Scores going into Final:
James $47,381
Carol $5,800
Peter $4,600
Tonight’s results:
Peter $4,600 – $4,600 = $0 (What is online banking)
Carol $5,800 – $3,401 = $2,399 (What is cyber)
James $47,381 + $35,000 = $82,381 (22-day total: $1,691,008)
Scores after the Jeopardy! Round:
James $13,200
Carol $1,800
Peter $1,400
Opening break taken after: 15 clues
Daily Double locations:
1) CLASSIC LITERATURE $1000 (1st pick)
James 0 +1000 (Peter 0 Carol 0)
2) GETTING ALL SCIENCE “E” $1200 (12th pick)
James 24400 +11381 (Peter 1400 Carol 1400)
3) GOVERNMENT & POLITICS $1200 (19th pick, $10,800 left on board)
Carol 4200 +2000 (James 42181 Peter 1400)
Overall Daily Double Efficiency for this game: 194
Unplayed clues:
J! round: None!
DJ! Round: None!
Total $ Left On Board: $0
Game Stats:
James $37,200 Coryat, 43 correct, 0 incorrect, 70.18% in first on buzzer, 1/1 on rebound attempts
Carol $5,000 Coryat, 6 correct, 2 incorrect, 10.53% in first on buzzer, 0/1 on rebound attempts
Peter $4,600 Coryat, 7 correct, 2 incorrect, 16.36% in first on buzzer
Combined Coryat Score: $46,800
Lach Trash: $4,400 (on 4 Triple Stumpers)
Coryat lost to incorrect responses (less double-correct responses): $2,800
James Holzhauer, stats to date:
803 correct, 27 incorrect
22/24 on rebound attempts (on 48 rebound opportunities)
59.00% in first on buzzer (731/1239)
49/53 on Daily Doubles (Net Earned: $462,416)
21/22 in Final Jeopardy
Average Coryat: $30,782
James Holzhauer, to win:
23 games: 97.877%
24: 95.799%
25: 93.765%
26: 91.775%
27: 89.826%
75: 32.068%
Avg. streak: 68.103 games.
(This is using the updated model.)
Tournament of Champions projections:
With a projected 80 regular-play games to go prior to the Tournament of Champions cutoff, after 500,000 simulations, our model shows:
James Holzhauer qualified 100.000% of the time.
Eric R. Backes qualified 93.537% of the time.
Anneke Garcia qualified 77.551% of the time.
Lindsey Shultz qualified 49.784% of the time.
Dave Leffler qualified 26.109% of the time.
Jonathan Dinerstein qualified 17.966% of the time.
Andy’s Thoughts:
- James’ 23rd game will be May 20.
- $82,381 is the 10th-highest one-day total of all time. James now holds the top 12 one-day totals of all time.
- On the final Daily Double, had Carol gone all-in and then ran the final 11 clues, her score still only would have been $19,200. James already had a runaway game sewn up at that point and Carol was absolutely correct to play for second place.
- If you took the 22 games James has already won out of the prediction model, it would still predict a streak of 46 games for James.
- The prediction model gives James a 78.975% chance of surpassing Ken Jennings’ winnings total of $2,520,700.
- James’ current per-game average winnings, $76,864, is only $136 less than Roger Craig’s previous one-day record of $77,000.
- James has now had seven games where he did not give an incorrect response. Ken Jennings only had two throughout his entire run.
- After winning by only $18 on Monday, James’ margins of victory the rest of the week: $91,326, $93,070, $70,415, and $79,972. His average final margin of victory over 22 games has been $64,913. For comparison, Ken Jennings’ average margin of victory in his first 22 games was $24,116.
Become a Supporter now! Make a monthly contribution to the site on Patreon!
Contestant photo credit: jeopardy.com
When commenting, please note that all comments on The Jeopardy! Fan must be in compliance with the Site Comment Policy.
If you are going to quote any statistics from this page or this website, attribution is required.
Have you had a chance to listen to our new podcast game show, Complete The List, yet? Check it out! It’s also available on Apple Podcasts.
Add up the Regular Play money list winnings of #3, #4, #5, #6 combined and they will not equal James Holzhauer.
Nice observation. Helps to put his earnings into perspective.
James now has answered the 2nd-most correct Final Jeopardy clues: 21 (of 22).
Umm, does this include tourneys or something? Cause he played the second most games alone yesterday.
Others have played more games. Only Ken has answered more Final Jeopardy clues correctly.
Andy, your prediction model has James with an average steak of about 68 games (46 more wins), but the 50% probability is at around 54 games. I suppose that’s because though “only” 32 more wins is needed to make 54, the combined possibilities of a longer win streak that has no limit raises the average to 68. Is that correct?
A suggested addition to your statistics is the top 50 or 100 game $ winnings of all-time (adjusted to double scores when $ amounts were half of today) or perhaps better all scores over $40,000, which would include 2nd place finishes like Adam Levin’s. The top 10 Hall of Fame list has been completely re-written by James. So this bigger list would document and continue to recognize the best Jeopardy games of all-time. I suggested games > $40,000 rather than just top 100 or top 50 because if James’s streak got really long he could soon dominate the top 50 and even top 100 and we wouldn’t see other historically top performances.
An example is Austin Rodgers, who before James was advertised as having 2 of the top 5 all-time games. Now, those 2 are barely top 20 and could drop much lower depending on James’ streak.
A more selective and probably meaningful list than games > $40,000 might be games > $50,000; after James, that list would likely only rarely need to be updated.
My two cents to the question of whether Brad or Ken or James is better. I start by deferring to a baseball analogy. Ken’s 74 game streak is most impressive and may be unbeatable, just as Joe Dimaggio’s 56 game hitting streak is thought unbreakable in baseball circles. Though a great Hall of fame player, Joe’s not on the short list of best all-time players or even best hitters. He did win two batting titles, but Ty Cobb (12), Honus Wagner and Tony Gwynn (8 each) won many more. Twenty five players have won three or more batting titles.
Ken, however, is on everyone’s shortlist of top 3 Jeopardy players, along with Brad and now James. But until James beats his $2.52 M and approaches or beats his streak Ken will remain #1 I’m sure to many fans. Before James can beat Ken’s streak, he will have beaten Brad’s all-time winnings total that includes tournament winnings.
Because of the 5 game limit we will never know how many consecutive regular games Brad could have won, but he certainly has the most impressive tournament record.
Because of these dynamics, a big 3 tournament with Ken, Brad, and James would generate great interest! Until then James has my vote as #1 even if he doesn’t top $2.52M for whatever reason.
I am pretty sure I am in the minority, but I find these games boring and uninteresting. They are uncompetitive and you know the winner by the break. The only game I enjoyed this week was the lone non-runaway.
I understand and appreciate the significance and uniqueness of James’ run, but I find myself not watching the show and coming here for the results
I agree with your statement and also find myself not watching the show and coming here for the results.
I agree with both statements. I hope someone steps up soon. I have no interest in watching a show that’s over after the first commercial break!
It would be very cool to have Ken Jennings show up on Jeopardy! as a prank contestant wearing an oversized mustache against James Holzhauer for the game James would probably beat Ken’s money record.
Ha! That would be very, very cool! I can hear Johnny Gilbert announcing: “…And from Seattle, Washington; please welcome Jen Kennings!”
To me, the boring and uninteresting games are the non-James shows in which winners finish with coryats in the teens, with 7 or 8 triple-stumpers and 3 or 4 leftover clues. James is the rarest of Jeopardy! champions, since he is not only winning by such huge margins but he is also doing it in a way no other player has — by changing the way the game is played. It’s captivating and exciting! To each their own, but I’d rather watch a brilliant player with a daring betting style than the non-James style. Watching the weekend re-run is like seeing a basketball games without a shot clock.
To me, the amazing thing is to have SO MUCH talent, savvy, and composure contained in an apparently normal, well-rounded, 35 year-old man. But to be fair, I feel that Ken and Brad also exhibited the same.
James is now starting to enjoy his time on the set too. When he mimicked being a streaker, he demonstrated his comfort level and enjoyment.
It would be interesting to find out if the Jeopardy staff saw this coming when they allowed James to be a contestant. I’m wondering if they were aware of what he had done on GSN’s “The Chase”. Allowing James to be a contestant is equivalent to a casino allowing a known professional Black Jack player in the door!
There have been many very well-known players from Quiz Bowl circuits who have made appearances. James fits the mold of a ringer, but hardly unprecedented.
Mr. Andy: Playing the “normal” way, running the table, and betting all on all doubles and the final J, what is the max a player can win? Assume the value of the average position of Doubles in your calculation. Have Doubles EVER been in a final row position?
Virtually, if not factually, never I am betting.
Also, what is keeping an audience member from cleaning up in Vegas or online sites legally since they sign no NDA? It is not insider info when something is a known fact, which it will be after he loses. Thanks
I’m a huge fan of James and do not think he’s broken the game. I think he is an exceptional player. This morning on CNN, Smerconish did a segment on Jeopardy. He began the segment talking about an opinion piece from the Washington Post titled: “James Holzhauer is a menace to ‘Jeopardy!” This piece by Charles Lane says, among other things, “In short, this professional gambler from Las Vegas does not so much play the game as beat the system. What’s entertaining about that? And beyond a certain point, what’s admirable?”
Smerconish then discussed this with a prior 5-time winner, whose name I do not remember. However, this prior winner played in the 90’s when there was a 5-game limit. He was in full agreement with Lane and Smerconish that Holzhauer was ruining the game.
While I found their thoughts interesting, I just could not agree with them.
Umm, does this include tourneys or something? Cause he played the second most games alone yesterday.
I don’t understand all the ” haters “. In ALL three we are experiencing a real-time Albert Einstein !!! with different styles and personalities but ALL are BRILLIANT !!! So why not just watch and enjoy the ride. Understandably I can see how James’ style has contributed to what some consider Jeopardy, the games as somewhat boring, but I see it as just the opposite by watching his BRILLIANCE and EXCITING manner of play. Probably because of his profession as a professional gambler, but as stated there have been professional trivia players who have not done NEARLY as well as James. So NOT only is he a gambler which has AIDED him to victory he has shown ( to use my term I continue to call him ) his BRILLIANCE !!! So again. Please stop the ” hating ” and continue to watch the ride until we get to view head-to-head match up(s). In summary, I think James will continue his streak, continue his per-game leads, surpass the TOTAL winnings, but fall short on the total of 74 straight. Oh yeah, I can see his totals being greater than the unbelievable 3mil. Plus and averaging over $70,000 per. Which to me is more impressive than the 74 in a row since 2nd place is like $20 000 per. ~ Peace out !!!
Brilliance is to be appreciated as an exceedingly rare commodity! James has it. Ours is to behold and enjoy it!
Hope my comments made sense to you as they have to me !!!